When government and industry leaders gathered at the 2025 Space and Missile Defense Symposium last week, the Department of Defense placed a moratorium on officials speaking in public sessions about Golden Dome, President Trump’s Iron Dome-inspired missile protection and alert initiative. However, news from private sessions between military leaders at the Missile Defense Agency and the industrial base have become known, with help from reporting by Breaking Defense.
The most significant of this information is about the Scalable Homeland Innovative Enterprise Layered Defense, a.k.a. SHIELD, contracting vehicle, which MDA released a pre-solicitation paper for at the very end of July. SHIELD is estimated to value at least $151 billion over 10 years and an official timeframe was issued at SMD for when to expect a request for proposal.
In the absence of Pentagon-led public discussions of Golden Dome, we must turn to industry voices on the matter: top leaders from the biggest competitors in GovCon will assemble for the “Supporting the Shield: Navy’s Role in the Golden Dome Architecture” panel at the 2025 Navy Summit on Aug. 26. Register now for Potomac Officers Club’s final event of its Summer DOD Series!
Table of Contents
What Are the Golden Dome Contracts?
SHIELD
So far, there are two Golden Dome-related contracting vehicles. SHIELD is the more recent of the two and is said to be extremely “versatile” and wide-ranging in its scope. It will theoretically allow DOD components to quickly issue task orders and contracts as needed under its umbrella.
Prototyping, cybersecurity, systems engineering, weapon design and data mining were all provided as possible SHIELD activities in the slides that were privately shown to industry.
MAA
The first-announced Golden Dome contract vehicle from MDA is entitled the Multiple Authority Announcement, which surfaced in late March. The MAA encompasses potential contracts for kinetic and hypersonic defense, command and control, space-based sensors and interceptors, and more, and Breaking Defense said a slide at SMD billed it as an acquisition mechanism for “disruptive technologies & rapid capability development from non-traditional sources.”
Up to this point, MDA has actively sought proposals under MAA for advanced capability concepts, and electromagnetic protection and threat object discrimination.
While both pertaining to Golden Dome, DOD spokespeople made it clear that SHIELD and MAA are two “distinct opportunities.”
What Is the Timeline for SHIELD?
Responses to the July 31-issued presolicitation notice for SHIELD are due in five days — on Aug. 19.
A final RFP for the project will be released before Oct. 1, the DOD told industry at the event.
Before that RFP is announced, it’s important to convene with your industrial base colleagues about how to prepare your business for this incredibly lucrative opportunity. Join the Golden Dome GovCon conversation at the 2025 Navy Summit on Aug. 26.
Related Articles
President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order to help streamline regulations and promote competition in the commercial space industry. Streamlining Launch Licenses The White House said Wednesday the EO will help streamline commercial license and permit approvals for U.S.-based operators by directing the secretary of Transportation to accelerate environmental reviews for launch and reentry licenses and permits. The policy also directs the secretary of Transportation to evaluate regulatory requirements to eliminate redundant, outdated or overly restrictive rules for launch and reentry vehicles. The order mandates the creation of a position within the Department of Transportation to advise on
Jules Hurst III has been appointed to perform the duties of the Defense Department’s under secretary (comptroller) and chief financial officer. The OUSD (C) announced Wednesday that he assumed the acting-capacity role on Aug. 11. Who Is Jules Hurst III? Before his appointment, Hurst was performing the duties of assistant secretary of defense for manpower and reserve affairs. He also performed the duties of under secretary of Defense for personnel and readiness and held various leadership roles under the same office. He also became the defense adviser and legislative director at the Office of the Speaker of the U.S. House
The House and Senate versions of the fiscal 2026 defense policy bill seek to replace subjective contractor evaluations in the Department of Defense’s Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System, or CPARS, with a “negative-only” system, Federal News Network reported Wednesday. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., introduced an amendment to the House Armed Services Committee’s FY 2026 defense bill that would direct DOD contracting officers to “only include negative performance events that have a material impact on contract performance or government interests in CPARS” as part of a push to reduce inconsistency and address subjectivity in contractor assessments. Contracting Officers to Document Negative